Australian Herbal Pharmacopoeia (working title), monograph AIP-PH-ALOSPP (formerly AIP-HP 017)
Date: 2026
Status: working document, version 1.0
Prepared by: the Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy, Far North Queensland, Australia. Every author and contributor is named at the end of the monograph.
0. Summary card, summary and contents
0.1 Identity card
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Monograph | AIP-PH-ALOSPP (formerly AIP-HP 017), version 1.0 draft. Published 2026; next review due 2029, or sooner if a controlled trial of aloes alone reports or a regulator changes its position on hydroxyanthracene derivatives |
| Title | Aloes resin (Aloe ferox Mill. and Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f.), Aloes folii succus siccatus |
| Accepted names | Aloe ferox Mill. (Cape aloes) and Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f. (Barbados or Curaçao aloes), Asphodelaceae, order Asparagales. Both accepted in WCVP (checked in September 2026) [1]. The trade name "Aloe spp." covers these two sources and the hybrids of A. ferox named by the pharmacopoeias [4,5] |
| Plant part | Concentrated and dried juice (exudate) that drains from the cut leaves: dark brown masses or powder [4]. Trade name in Australian practice: aloes resin [2] |
| Principal synonyms | Aloe barbadensis Mill. (the name used by Ph. Eur., the EU monograph and the Permissible Ingredients Determination for A. vera); Aloe horrida Haw., A. pseudoferox Salm-Dyck, A. supralaevis Haw. (for A. ferox) [1,3,4,6] |
| Common names | Aloes, Cape aloes, bitter aloe, Barbados aloes, Curaçao aloes; Afrikaans bitteraalwyn; Indian names ghrita kumari, kumari, ghikuar; Chinese lu wei, lo-hoei [5] |
| Status in pharmacopoeias | Ph. Eur.: yes, monographs 0257 Aloes, Barbados; 0258 Aloes, Cape; 0259 Aloes dry extract, standardised (8th Edition read) [4]. Japanese Pharmacopoeia 18th edn: Aloe and Powdered Aloe (Cape type) [11]. WHO Monographs vol. 1: Aloe [5]. EU/HMPC: EU herbal monograph, well-established use, 2016 [6]. USP, BP, BHP 1996: listed by the HMPC and by Barnes; texts not read for this version [7,9] |
| Australian status | Permissible Ingredients Determination items 480 ALOE FEROX (purposes A, E, H), 481 ALOE PERRYI (A, H), 482 ALOE VERA (A, E, H) and 483 ALOES CAPE (A, H): for oral use, hydroxyanthracene derivatives calculated as anhydrous barbaloin are a mandatory component, with laxative warning statements set by dose [3]. Not in the Poisons Standard [12]. A. vera introduced in Queensland; A. ferox not recorded as established in Australia [1,15]. A. ferox is in CITES Appendix II; A. vera is not listed [13] |
| Named markers | Hydroxyanthracene derivatives expressed as barbaloin: not less than 28.0 per cent (Barbados), not less than 18.0 per cent (Cape), dried drug, Ph. Eur. spectrophotometric assay [4]. Barbaloin by HPLC: not less than 4.0 per cent, JP18 (Cape type) [11]. Identity: barbaloin, aloesin and aloinosides A and B (Cape) or the violet 7-hydroxyaloin zone (Barbados) by TLC [4] |
| Evidence snapshot | Short-term relief of occasional constipation, aloes alone: Tier T for the use and Tier P for the mechanism; no controlled trial of aloes alone exists; accepted in the EU as well-established use on marketing history and pharmacology [6,7]. Chronic constipation, celandine-aloe-psyllium capsules: Tier C, 1 small RCT of a three-herb product, very low certainty [7]. Blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: Tier C, 1 uncontrolled series of 5 patients [7,9]. Colorectal cancer risk with anthranoid laxatives: observational class data, inconsistent [7] |
| Suggested citation | Ridley T, Iggulden L. Aloes resin (Aloe ferox Mill. and Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f.), Aloes folii succus siccatus. Australian Herbal Pharmacopoeia (working title), AIP-PH-ALOSPP, version 1.0. Cardwell, QLD: AIP; 2026. DOI to be assigned |
| Provenance | Original AIP data: none. Every analytical figure, limit, method and trial result in this monograph comes from the cited sources; the distribution map, the dose comparison and the evidence map are drawn by AIP from published data, and the schematics are redrawn from pharmacopoeial descriptions |
| Compiler and review | Compiled by Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research). Technical review: Dr Fiona MacAllister (Botanical, sections 1-5 and adulterants in 10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Hana Suzuki (QA, sections 6-10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Eleanor Whitcombe (Medicine, sections 12, 13, 15), reviewed in 2026. Evidence and citation audit: Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research; the compiler, so not independent), reviewed in 2026. Layout review: Jesse Kirby (Community Outreach, whole-document layout and figures), reviewed in 2026. Published: not yet. Last modified: 2026. Version 1.0 draft |
| Canonical URL | /pharmacopoeia/aloe-spp/ (on publication) |

0.2 Summary
Aloes is the bitter yellow juice that drains from the cut leaves of two aloes, boiled down and left to set into dark brown masses. Cape aloes comes from wild Aloe ferox in South Africa; Barbados or Curaçao aloes comes from cultivated Aloe vera in the Caribbean and Venezuela [4,5,8]. The juice sits in a ring of cells around the vascular bundles of the leaf, apart from the clear central gel sold as "aloe vera", and the two products must never be confused [5,8]. The European Pharmacopoeia identifies each kind by TLC (barbaloin and aloesin in both; aloinosides in Cape aloes; a violet 7-hydroxyaloin zone in Barbados aloes) and assays hydroxyanthracene derivatives as barbaloin: at least 28 per cent in Barbados aloes and 18 per cent in Cape aloes [4].
Aloes is a stimulant laxative. The anthrone C-glycosides pass unchanged to the colon, where bacteria turn them into aloe-emodin-9-anthrone, which increases colonic secretion and motility; the effect comes 6 to 12 hours after a dose [6]. No controlled trial of aloes alone has been published. The EU accepts short-term use for occasional constipation on long marketing and class pharmacology [6,7]. The main safety points are electrolyte loss with prolonged use, a list of contraindications shared with all anthranoid laxatives, and an unresolved genotoxicity and carcinogenicity question: a whole-leaf A. vera extract caused large-bowel tumours in rats, and EFSA concluded that hydroxyanthracene derivatives should be treated as genotoxic and carcinogenic unless shown otherwise [22,23,24]. The doses given in Australian practitioner texts, if taken daily, supply more dried aloes than the WHO and EU ranges (section 12).
0.3 Contents and extent
| Section | Pages (approx.) |
|---|---|
| 0 Summary card, summary, contents | 4 |
| 1 Nomenclature | 1 |
| 2 Definition | 0.5 |
| 3 Source and Australian supply, 3.1 origin and chemistry | 3 |
| 4 Macroscopy | 2.5 |
| 5 Microscopy | 1.5 |
| 6 Chemistry | 2 |
| 7 Named markers and assay limits | 1 |
| 8 TLC fingerprint | 1 |
| 9 HPLC fingerprint | 1 |
| 10 Identity, purity, adulterants, contaminants | 2 |
| 11 Traditional use | 1 |
| 12 Current practice, preparations and doses | 1.5 |
| 13 Clinical evidence | 2.5 |
| 14 Pharmacology | 1 |
| 15 Safety | 3 |
| 16–18 Discussion, conclusions, research needed | 2 |
| 19 References | 2 |
| 20 Document control | 1 |
Totals (approx.): 32 printed A4 pages; 19 figures, of which 17 are images (6 photographs, 2 botanical plates and 1 photomicrograph of the source leaf, all openly licensed or public domain; 1 licensed drawing; 7 AIP drawings, schematics and charts) and 2 are captioned placeholders; 0 photomicrographs of the drug and 0 chromatograms; 23 tables; 1 randomised trial and 2 uncontrolled human reports graded, all on the HMPC summaries while the full texts are requested; 1 source graded "caution" on the integrity screen; 30 references.
Gaps in the figure set. Figure slot F4 (photomicrographs of the powdered drug) and slot F8 (HPLC chromatogram) are placeholders: no openly licensed photomicrograph of powdered aloes or chromatogram of the dried exudate was found (a licensed photomicrograph of A. vera leaf epidermis, Figure 12, shows the source leaf only), and AIP has not yet run either on a vouchered lot. Slot F3 is filled by a schematic redrawn from the pharmacopoeial descriptions and by two licensed photographs of the harvest; an AIP photograph of a dispensary lot with a scale bar is pending.
0.4 Contributors and access
Compiled by Dr Thomas Ridley, Head of Education and Research. The section reviews by Botanical (Dr Fiona MacAllister), QA (Dr Hana Suzuki) and Medicine (Dr Eleanor Whitcombe) and the evidence and citation audit by Education and Research (Dr Thomas Ridley) are on record, as is the layout review by Community Outreach (Jesse Kirby). Pending: the Librarian’s reference check and the Legal review. Each is recorded in section 20 when it lands. A preview of the monograph and all of section 15 (Safety) are free to every reader; the full text is for Scholar members and above, or the AUD $20 copy of this one title.
Free to every reader. The safety section of every monograph is open to everyone, signed in or not. In an emergency call 000. For poisoning, call the Poisons Information Centre on 13 11 26.
15. Safety
15.1 Adverse effects
| Effect | Detail | Source | Evidence and causality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain, cramping, liquid stools | Especially in irritable colon or with overdose; reduce the dose | EU monograph [6]; WHO [5] | Class pharmacology and regulatory consensus; frequency not known |
| Hypersensitivity | Frequency not known; most reports concern topical gel products | EU monograph [6]; HMPC [7] | Regulatory; no case with the dried exudate traced |
| Urine discolouration | Yellow or red-brown, pH-dependent, harmless; may give false positive urinary urobilinogen and oestrogen (Kober) tests | EU monograph [6]; WHO [5] | Class; laboratory interference |
| Electrolyte loss with long use | Hypokalaemia, hypocalcaemia, metabolic acidosis, albuminuria, haematuria, weakness, orthostatic hypotension in older people, secondary aldosteronism | WHO [5]; EU monograph [6] | Class; reported with chronic stimulant laxative abuse |
| Pseudomelanosis coli | Pigmented colonic mucosa after 4 to 13 months of anthranoid use; reverses 6 to 12 months after stopping (WHO: 4 to 12 months); prevalence 62 per cent after chronic anthranoid use | HMPC [7]; EU monograph [6]; WHO [5] | Observational (endoscopy series), class; benign in itself |
| Loss of haustral folds | Barium enema finding in chronic stimulant laxative users (bisacodyl, phenolphthalein, senna, casanthranol) | HMPC, summarising Joo and colleagues [7] | Observational, class; aloes not among the drugs studied |
| Toxic hepatitis | Chronic overdose of anthranoid laxatives; the case reports are for senna | EU monograph [6]; HMPC [7]; WHO [5] | Case reports (senna); read across to aloes |
| Acute renal failure | One case, Soweto, South Africa: oliguric renal failure and liver dysfunction after a traditional remedy shown to contain Cape aloes | HMPC, summarising Luyckx and colleagues 2002 [7] | Single case; the HMPC judged causality not assessable |
| Nephritis | One German spontaneous report of suspected toxic interstitial nephritis after an unspecified Mexican aloe extract; resolved on stopping | HMPC [7] | Single report; extract unspecified; the HMPC judged causality not assessable |
Overdose. Griping pain and severe diarrhoea with fluid and electrolyte loss; treatment is supportive with generous fluids and monitoring of electrolytes, potassium above all, especially in older people [5,6]. Barnes adds nephritis, bloody diarrhoea and haemorrhagic gastritis at large doses [9].
15.2 Toxicology, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity
Genotoxicity. Aloes extracts were negative in bacterial mutation tests in most reports, positive in Salmonella TA1537 only at 5,000 µg/plate, and clastogenic in CHO cells at 3,000 to 4,000 µg/mL without metabolic activation; a mouse micronucleus test was negative [7]. Aloe-emodin and emodin were mutagenic or clastogenic in several in vitro systems, acting through topoisomerase II; in vivo tests of aloe-emodin (mouse micronucleus, rat chromosome aberration, mouse spot test, rat hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis) were negative [7]. EFSA’s 2018 opinion reached a stricter view: aloe-emodin was genotoxic in vivo; aloe extracts were genotoxic in vitro, possibly because of their hydroxyanthracene content; and hydroxyanthracene derivatives should be treated as genotoxic and carcinogenic unless specific data show otherwise [24]. EFSA could not set a daily intake free of concern [24]. The two European bodies weighed the same kind of data differently; the question is open. An in vivo comet test of aloe-emodin published in 2021 (Galli and colleagues) is requested in full text and not assessed here.
Carcinogenicity. In the US National Toxicology Program’s 2-year drinking-water study, a non-decolourised whole-leaf extract of A. vera (aloin A 5.7 to 7.2 mg/g in the 2-year material) gave clear evidence of carcinogenic activity in male and female F344/N rats, with adenomas and carcinomas of the large intestine at 1.0 and 1.5 per cent; none were seen in controls. There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity in mice [22]. IARC classified whole-leaf extract of A. vera as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B): inadequate evidence in humans, sufficient in experimental animals [23]. The HMPC’s assessor noted that the extract was not specified by hydroxyanthracene content, so a dose relation cannot be drawn, but that the results add to the concern about anthraquinones [7]. A 2-year study of Aloe arborescens whole-leaf powder in rats found colon adenomas at 4 per cent of diet only, which the authors put down to diarrhoea-related irritation [7]. No carcinogenicity study of the dried exudate itself exists [6].
Human epidemiology (class data). As summarised by the HMPC: a retrospective endoscopy series (3,049 patients) and a prospective series (1,095) gave a relative risk of 3.04 (95 per cent CI 1.18 to 4.9) for colorectal cancer with chronic anthranoid laxative abuse (Siegers and colleagues 1993); the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study found no association (Kune 1993); a prospective case-control study (202 cancers, 114 adenomas, 238 controls) found odds ratios of 1.0 for both (Nusko and colleagues 2000); a meta-analysis of 14 case-control studies gave pooled odds ratios of 1.48 for constipation and 1.46 for cathartic use, which the authors attributed to diet (Sonnenberg and colleagues 1993) [7]. The HMPC concluded that the question of a carcinogenic risk from long-term anthranoid laxatives "is still open" [7]. The full texts of the Siegers and Nusko papers are requested.
Reproductive toxicity. No teratogenic or fetotoxic effects in rats given aloe extract up to 1,000 mg/kg or aloin A up to 200 mg/kg [5]. The HMPC relates the reproductive findings to maternal toxicity from diarrhoea [6,7].
15.3 Contraindications
| Contraindication | Source | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Intestinal obstruction or stenosis, atony, appendicitis, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis), abdominal pain of unknown origin, severe dehydration with electrolyte depletion | EU monograph [6]; WHO [5]; Barnes [9]; Braun and Cohen [10]; MediHerb: not in intestinal upsets, irritation or inflammation [2] | Class pharmacology, regulatory consensus |
| Children under 12 years (EU); under 10 years (WHO) | [6,5]; Braun and Cohen: contraindicated in children [10]; MediHerb: not under 12 [2] | Regulatory consensus |
| Pregnancy, and those trying to conceive | EU: contraindicated (genotoxicity concern) [6]; WHO: only under supervision after weighing risks [5]; Barnes: contraindicated, and aloes is reputed to be an abortifacient (a traditional claim, not tested) [9]; Braun and Cohen: not advised [10]; MediHerb: caution, and avoid in those trying to conceive [2] | Regulatory (EU) and expert opinion; no human data; rat studies found no teratogenic effect (Tier P) [5]. Medicine position: contraindicated. The genotoxicity question in 15.2 is open and bulk-forming laxatives are available |
| Lactation | EU: contraindicated (rhein excreted in milk) [6]; WHO: only under supervision [5]; Barnes: avoid [9]; MediHerb: caution [2] | Class pharmacokinetics (small amounts of active anthranoid metabolites of other anthranoids pass into milk) [6]; no infant data. Medicine position: contraindicated |
| Hypersensitivity to aloe | [6,10] | Regulatory |
| Haemorrhoids, kidney disease, IBS, diverticulitis, chronic constipation, cramps, colic, nephritis, undiagnosed abdominal symptoms | WHO [5]; Barnes [9] | Expert opinion |
| Faecal impaction; nausea or vomiting | [6,10] | Class pharmacology |
15.4 Herb–drug interactions
| Interacting drug | Effect | Grade | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac glycosides (digoxin) | Laxative-induced hypokalaemia potentiates them | Theoretical (class pharmacodynamic; no clinical case with aloes); regulatory consensus. Real risk with repeated or excessive use | EU monograph [6]; WHO [5]; Braun and Cohen: avoid the combination [10]; MediHerb chart, on Commission E and ESCOP: monitor, low risk at normal doses [2] |
| Antiarrhythmics, quinidine, drugs that prolong the QT interval | Hypokalaemia interacts | Theoretical (class pharmacodynamic); regulatory consensus | EU monograph [6]; WHO [5]; MediHerb chart: avoid excessive laxative doses, high-potassium diet [2] |
| Thiazide and loop diuretics, corticosteroids, licorice root | Additive potassium loss | Theoretical (class pharmacodynamic); regulatory consensus | EU monograph [6]; WHO [5]; MediHerb [2] |
| Other laxatives | Additive griping and fluid loss | Theoretical | Braun and Cohen [10]; Barnes advises against combining anthraquinone laxatives [9] |
| Any oral drug | Faster transit may reduce absorption | Theoretical | WHO [5] |
| Hypoglycaemic drugs | Possible additive lowering of blood glucose | Theoretical; rests on the uncontrolled series in 13.2 and on animal data, and the source concerns oral A. vera in general | Braun and Cohen [10] |
| General anaesthesia | MediHerb advises stopping 7 days before | Manufacturer precaution; no mechanism given | MediHerb [2] |
| Sevoflurane (bleeding) | One case of intraoperative blood loss after A. vera tablets; preparation not comparable | Case report, unassessable | HMPC [7] |
No pharmacokinetic interaction study of aloes resin was found; the HMPC found none [7].
15.5 Populations
Pregnancy and lactation: contraindicated (15.3). Children: not under 12 years; see 15.3; no clinical data [7]. Older people: electrolyte monitoring matters most, and weakness and orthostatic hypotension may be worse with repeated use [5,6]. Kidney disease: electrolyte imbalance [6]. People taking digoxin, antiarrhythmics, diuretics or corticosteroids: see 15.4; a potassium check is worth making if aloes is taken for more than a few doses.
15.6 Australian regulatory safety position
The Permissible Ingredients Determination requires, for an oral medicine whose maximum daily dose supplies more than 10 mg of hydroxyanthracene derivatives, the statements "Use in children under 12 years is not recommended" (CHILD3) and "Prolonged use may cause serious bowel problems" (LAX2), and statement LAX3, which warns against use with abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea and carries a pregnancy and breastfeeding advisory; "Drink plenty of water" (LAX1) when marketed as a laxative; and, when not marketed as a laxative, statements naming the herb and warning that the product may have a laxative effect [3]. Aloes is not scheduled in the Poisons Standard; danthron (1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone), a synthetic relative, is Schedule 4 for human use [12].
TGA safety alerts, recalls and adverse event reports. The TGA website was searched in September 2026 for aloe with safety alert, advisory, recall and Medicines Safety Update. No safety alert, advisory or Medicines Safety Update item on aloes or on aloe-containing oral laxatives was found. Two Class II consumer-level recalls in 2006 (TGA references R2005/1702-4 and RN-2006-0010) concerned topical aloe vera gel, cream and spray products that may have been contaminated with bacteria; they do not bear on the dried exudate [30]. One aloe-containing oral laxative, Nulax Fruit Laxative with Aloe and Flaxseed (ARTG 299196), is listed among the TGA’s cancellations by sponsors, cancelled under section 30(1)(c) of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 with effect from 27/06/2024; no safety reason is published [30]. The Database of Adverse Event Notifications could not be searched: its public search sits behind an interactive terms-of-use page that refused automated access in September 2026. It is to be searched by hand before version 1.1 (section 20).
Referral. Anyone thinking of using aloes, and anyone who needs a laxative for more than a few days, should consult a degree-qualified herbalist with competencies and adequate training in pharmacognosy. A change in bowel habit, blood in the stool, or pain, nausea or vomiting needs assessment before any laxative is taken; so does rectal bleeding, or no bowel movement within 24 hours of a laxative dose [5,6].
26 more pages follow · 12,997 words, 18 figures, 18 tables
Still to come in this monograph
- 1. Nomenclature
- 2. Definition
- 3. Source and Australian supply
- 3.1 Where it must be grown: origin, climate and chemistry
- 4. Macroscopy
- 5. Microscopy
- 6. Chemistry
- 7. Named markers and assay limits
- 8. TLC fingerprint
- 9. HPLC fingerprint
- 10. Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants
- 11. Traditional use
- 12. Current practice: use, preparations and doses
- 13. Clinical evidence
- 14. Pharmacology
- 16. Discussion
- 17. Conclusions
- 18. Research still needed
- 19. References
- 20. Document control
The rest of this monograph is open to members. One membership covers every members’ feature on the site.
Checking your membership…
Report an error or submit evidence
If something in this monograph is wrong, out of date or missing, tell us and show us the evidence. Every report is logged under the AIP Evidence Charter and assessed on the evidence alone; the outcome is kept on the record, and an upheld report is corrected with a dated notice on this page.
Open the report form
The Institute sets and publishes its own monographs. The catalogue is in Publications.
