Coming soonCannabis EducationCannabis Education at the Institute: a professional course and a free public program.Register your interest

Not-for-profit research & education institute · Cassowary Coast, Far North Queensland


Baptisia root

Baptisia root - Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy
In this article
  1. 0. Free-teaser block
  2. 1. Nomenclature
  3. 2. Definition
  4. 3. Source and Australian supply
  5. 4. Macroscopy
  6. 5. Microscopy
  7. 6. Chemistry
  8. 7. Named markers and assay limits
  9. 8. TLC fingerprint
  10. 9. HPLC fingerprint
  11. 10. Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants
  12. 11. Traditional use
  13. 12. Current practice: use, preparations and doses
  14. 13. Clinical evidence
  15. 14. Pharmacology
  16. 15. Safety
  17. 16. Discussion
  18. 17. Conclusions
  19. 18. Research still needed
  20. 19. References
  21. 20. Document control
Share this articleFacebookXLinkedInWhatsApp

AIP-PH-BAPTIN · Version 1.0 draft · First published 2026 · Last modified 2026 · Version history · Report an error

Baptisia root (Baptisia tinctoria (L.) R.Br.), Fabaceae

Australian Herbal Pharmacopoeia (working title) · Monograph AIP-PH-BAPTIN · Version 1.0 draft
Date: 2026
Status: working document, version 1.0. Not a statutory standard.
Prepared by: the Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy, Far North Queensland, Australia. Every author and contributor is named at the end of the monograph.

Figure 1b. Flowers of Baptisia tinctoria, Howard County, Maryland, USA, 19/07/2017: bright yellow pea-flowers on slender
Figure 1b. Flowers of Baptisia tinctoria, Howard County, Maryland, USA, 19/07/2017: bright yellow pea-flowers on slender pedicels. Focus-stacked photograph, USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab (specimen collected by Helen Lowe Metzman), public domain, Wikimedia Commons (image record ref 27).

0. Free-teaser block

0.1 Identity card

Register number AIP-PH-BAPTIN (MediHerb A–Z list No. 11)
Title Baptisia root (Baptisia tinctoria (L.) R.Br.), Baptisiae tinctoriae radix
Version / year 1.0 draft, 2026. Next review 2029, or sooner if a trial of Baptisia root alone reports, or if the primary reports of the combination-product trials change a grade
Accepted binomial Baptisia tinctoria (L.) R.Br., combination published in W.T. Aiton, Hortus Kewensis, 2nd edn, 3: 6 (1811), as cited by WCVP; basionym Sophora tinctoria L., Species Plantarum: 373 (1753). Accepted in the World Checklist of Vascular Plants, Fabaceae 2026 v.7, read through ChecklistBank in September 2026; IPNI 1198899-2, whose record (read in September 2026) gives the same authority, "(L.) R.Br. in W.T.Aiton" [1]
Family Fabaceae (Leguminosae), subfamily Papilionoideae; no family change affects the genus [1]
Plant part Dried root and root-head (crown), with not more than 10 per cent of crown, stem or other foreign matter in the historical US National Formulary definition [8]
Latin drug name Baptisiae tinctoriae radix (Kraemer 1920 heads the drug "Radix Baptisiae Tinctoriae") [9]
Principal synonyms Sophora tinctoria L. and Podalyria tinctoria (L.) Lam. (homotypic); Baptisia gibbesii Small, B. tinctoria var. crebra Fernald, B. tinctoria var. gibbesii (Small) Fernald (heterotypic) [1]. Authority also written "(L.) Vent." in some herbals [3]
Common names English: wild indigo, yellow indigo, horsefly weed, indigo weed, rattle bush, yellow broom, clover broom [10,12]. French: indigo sauvage. German: Baptisie [8]. Trade name in Australia: Baptisia [2]
Pharmacopoeial status elsewhere US National Formulary IV (1916): yes, "Baptisia", quoted in full in the US Dispensatory, 1918 [8]; no longer in the USP–NF. Ph. Eur., BP, WHO, EMA/HMPC, ChP, API: no monograph found. No German Commission E or ESCOP monograph was found. The British Herbal Pharmacopoeia is not among the sources read for this edition, so its status is left open (section 18)
Australian status Permissible Ingredients Determination: yes, item 764 BAPTISIA TINCTORIA, purposes A and H, no specific requirements in column 4 [4]. Poisons Standard: the plant is not named; the alkaloids cytisine (Schedules 3 and 4) and sparteine (Schedule 4) are, and the Standard’s section 7 extends a substance entry to that substance "prepared from natural sources" (section 15.6) [5]. Introduced: no occurrence collected in Australia in the Atlas of Living Australia [6]; not native, so no Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld) permit applies; not listed in the Biosecurity Regulation 2016 (Qld) [7]
Named markers Cytisine (CID 10235): identity and safety marker; no limit has been set anywhere; an AIP upper limit is proposed as research (sections 7, 18) [8,10,18]. Genistein (CID 5280961) and biochanin A (CID 5280373): isoflavones named in the root; identity only; no limit [3]. Ash: not more than 5 per cent (NF IV) [8]
Evidence snapshot Common cold, three-herb product (Baptisia with Echinacea and Thuja): Tier B, 2 RCTs (n = 259 and n = 94), low certainty, known through a manufacturer-authored review and a handbook abstract [16,42]. Adjunct to antibiotics in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, same product: Tier C, 1 RCT (n = 53), very low certainty [16]. Acute rhinosinusitis, same product with doxycycline: Tier C, 1 comparative study (n = 90), very low certainty [17]. Baptisia root alone for throat, mouth and lymph-gland infections: Tier T [2,3,10,13]. Immune and antibacterial activity: Tier P [15,16]. No trial has tested Baptisia root alone
Suggested citation Ridley T, Iggulden L. Baptisia root (Baptisia tinctoria (L.) R.Br.), Baptisiae tinctoriae radix. AIP-PH-BAPTIN, version 1.0 draft. Cardwell: Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy; 2026. DOI to be assigned
Provenance Original AIP data: none. Every analytical figure, limit, method and trial result belongs to the source cited beside it. Sections 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 carry AIP bench data pending (no AIP voucher, section, plate or run yet). The distribution map (Figure 9), charts (Figures 10, 11, 12, 14, 15) and drawings (Figures 3b, 5, 6) are AIP drawings from cited data
Compiler and review Compiled by Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research). Technical review: Dr Fiona MacAllister (Botanical, sections 1-5, 10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Hana Suzuki (QA, sections 6-10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Eleanor Whitcombe (Medicine, sections 12, 13, 15, with 16–18 checked), reviewed in 2026; Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research, evidence and citation audit of the whole document and its figures; also the compiler, so this audit is not independent of the text), reviewed in 2026; Jesse Kirby (Community Outreach, layout and figures of the whole document), reviewed in 2026. Published: not yet. Last modified: 2026. Version 1.0 draft
Canonical URL /pharmacopoeia/baptisia-tinctoria/ (on publication)
Figure 1. Baptisia tinctoria in flower on sandstone river-scour of the Caney Fork near Todd Town, Cumberland County, Ten
Figure 1. Baptisia tinctoria in flower on sandstone river-scour of the Caney Fork near Todd Town, Cumberland County, Tennessee, USA, 06/07/2014: a slender flowering shoot with small trifoliolate leaves and a short terminal raceme of yellow pea-flowers. Photograph Mason Brock (Masebrock), public domain, Wikimedia Commons (image record ref 27). Species checked from the image against the descriptions in refs 10 and 12; not an AIP voucher.

0.2 Summary

Baptisia root is the dried root and root-head of wild indigo, a bushy perennial pea of dry, poor, sunny ground in eastern North America. It does not grow wild in Australia and is imported. No current pharmacopoeia carries it. The last official standard was the United States National Formulary IV (1916), which described the root, its powder under the microscope and an ash limit of 5 per cent. Nobody has published an assay limit for any of its constituents.

The root contains the quinolizidine alkaloid cytisine (the "baptitoxine" of the nineteenth century), isoflavones including genistein and biochanin A, glycoproteins and arabinogalactan-proteins, and polysaccharides. Cytisine is the safety concern. It is a scheduled poison in Australia when used as a pure substance, and no published source gives a measured figure for it in the root.

Australian practitioners use a 1:2 liquid extract at 8 to 20 mL a week, with a firm ceiling of 3 mL a day, for throat, mouth and lymph-gland infections and feverish colds. That use rests on Eclectic tradition. The clinical trials all tested a German three-herb product in which Baptisia is one ingredient, so they cannot show what Baptisia does on its own. Large doses cause vomiting and purging.

0.3 Contents with extent

Section Extent (A4 pages, measured from this printing)
0 Free-teaser block 5
1 Nomenclature 1
2 Definition 1
3 Source and Australian supply, with 3.1 origin, climate and chemistry 2
4 Macroscopy 2
5 Microscopy 2
6 Chemistry 1
7 Named markers and assay limits 1
8 TLC fingerprint 2
9 HPLC fingerprint 1
10 Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants 2
11 Traditional use 2
12 Current practice 2
13 Clinical evidence 2
14 Pharmacology 1
15 Safety 3
16–18 Discussion, conclusions, research needed 3
19 References 2
20 Document control 3
Totals (draft) This printing runs to 37 A4 pages. 31 embedded figures: 11 licensed or public-domain photographs, 9 public-domain plates and drawings (3 of them from a 1920 drawing that includes a root transverse section), 1 licensed HPTLC plate and 1 licensed HPLC chromatogram (both of related plants, not Baptisia), 1 AIP composite of PubChem structures and 8 AIP drawings and charts. About 22 tables. 0 AIP photomicrographs, 0 AIP chromatograms, 0 AIP plates. 5 human studies given a provisional risk-of-bias judgement and 3 outcomes graded with GRADE; 1 older trial and 4 adjunct studies listed but not graded; 3 trial registers searched. 48 numbered references

Gaps stated plainly. AIP holds no voucher, photomicrograph, TLC plate or chromatogram of Baptisia root. No published TLC or HPLC fingerprint of the root itself was found in the sources read, so sections 8 and 9 are proposed methods assembled from published work on related Fabaceae, and Figures 7 and 8 show those published systems run on other plants. No licensed photograph of the dried root was found; Figure 3 is a 1920 drawing and Figure 3b an AIP schematic. The primary reports of the combination-product trials, the arabinogalactan-protein papers and the 2015 poisoning case report are being obtained in full text for version 1.1; this edition reports the trials as published reviews and a handbook describe them, with provisional risk-of-bias judgements. The TGA safety-alert and adverse-event database searches, which could not be completed in September 2026, were completed in October 2026: no safety alert, and four Australian spontaneous reports (section 15).

0.4 Contributors and access

Compiled by Dr Thomas Ridley, Head of Education and Research. The Botanical review (sections 1–5 and 10), the QA review (sections 6–10), the Medicine review (sections 12, 13 and 15, with 16–18 checked) and the Education and Research evidence and citation audit (whole document) are on record. The compiler also did the audit, so the traditional-use section and the reference list still await independent checks by History and Philosophy and by the Librarian. Dr Luke Iggulden, Chief Scientific Officer, is senior author: he set the scope of the pharmacopoeia series and made the research possible. A preview of the monograph and all of section 15 (Safety) are free to every reader; the full text is for Scholar members and above, or the AUD $20 copy of this one title.

Free to every reader. The safety section of every monograph is open to everyone, signed in or not. In an emergency call 000. For poisoning, call the Poisons Information Centre on 13 11 26.

15. Safety

15.1 Adverse effects in trials. The manufacturer’s review reports only mild to moderate adverse events at a rare frequency in the three GCP trials of the three-herb product, none serious [16]. In post-marketing data from 1999–2003 it counts 63 adverse-reaction reports against an estimated 12.2 million patients treated, most of them skin rashes, and one serious case (Löfgren’s syndrome) judged unlikely to be related [16]. Taw and colleagues note photosensitivity and gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea with the product [17]. Barrett’s account of the 1999 trial records no serious adverse events and that of the 1984 study none at all [42]. These figures concern the combination, come mostly from the manufacturer, and give no Baptisia-specific adverse-effect rate. Causality for any single ingredient cannot be assessed from them.

Australian spontaneous reports. The TGA’s Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN – medicines), data to 24/09/2026, searched in October 2026, holds four reports naming a Baptisia product, each with it as the single suspected medicine and none with a fatal outcome [48]. One names MediHerb Baptisia alone (an adult aged 18–64; vertigo, ataxia and abnormal coordination). Three name Esberitox N, the three-herb tablet (reaction terms across the three: anaphylactic reaction, swollen tongue, asthma, pruritus and urticaria). The public view gives no dose, preparation detail, date of onset or outcome, and the DAEN states that inclusion does not mean the event was confirmed or caused by the medicine. The Esberitox reports fit the allergic and skin reactions that dominate the manufacturer’s post-marketing data [16] and the label caution on Echinacea allergy [42]. The single MediHerb report is neurological; with the cytisine content of the root unmeasured, it is noted here and not interpreted further. Causality was not assessed (no case detail is public).

15.2 Effects of large doses (historical). "Large doses are dangerous, acting as an emeto-cathartic. Sometimes this action is so violent as to produce gastro-enteritis. Large doses have caused an excessive flow of viscid saliva, ulceration of the pharynx, insomnia, restlessness, and ocular disturbances" [10]. Ellingwood: "In poisonous doses there is an acceleration of respiration and reflex activity followed by death from central paralytic asphyxia" [13]. The young shoots, eaten as greens in New England, purged when too far grown [10,12]. Chevallier notes that Baptisia can occasionally cause nausea and vomiting [11]. Hoffmann states that no side effects or interactions have been reported at his dose of 1 mL of 1:5 tincture three times a day [3].

15.3 Case reports. A 2015 case report of Baptisia poisoning in the Journal of Emergency Medicine, and a 2016 letter in the same journal on the botanical identity of the plant involved, are being obtained in full text; they are not described here until read, and causality will be assessed (WHO-UMC) on the full reports for version 1.1. Until then the historical accounts in 15.2 are the only descriptions of poisoning we have read.

15.4 Contraindications and cautions. Grades: clinical (human data), historical (recorded clinical observation, pre-modern), expert opinion (a practitioner or manufacturer statement without stated data), theoretical (inferred from chemistry or pharmacology).

Statement Basis Grade Source
Do not exceed 3 mL a day of 1:2 extract (about 1.5 g root); narrow dosage range, measure doses accurately Manufacturer’s Baptisia entry; basis not stated Expert opinion [2]
Large doses are emetic and purgative, with salivation and restlessness; poisonous doses depress respiration Eclectic observation Historical [10,13]
Pregnancy: contraindicated See the Medicine position below Theoretical, with consistent expert opinion [2,11,18,22]
Breastfeeding: contraindicated As for pregnancy; no data on transfer into milk Theoretical, with consistent expert opinion [2,11,18]
Use for at most 1 week at a time Popular herbal by a medical herbalist Expert opinion [11]
Stop 7 days before general anaesthesia Manufacturer’s Baptisia entry; no reason given, and no mechanism or case known to us Expert opinion [2]
Three-herb tablets: not recommended in autoimmune disease, HIV infection or allergy to Echinacea US product label as quoted Expert opinion (manufacturer); relates mainly to the Echinacea ingredients [42]
Three-herb tablets: allergic reactions, including one report of anaphylactic reaction Three Australian spontaneous reports Clinical (spontaneous reports, unconfirmed, causality not assessed) [48]

Medicine position on pregnancy and breastfeeding. Do not use Baptisia root in pregnancy or while breastfeeding. The root contains cytisine, a nicotine-like alkaloid [18], in an amount no one has measured; large doses are emetic and purgative [10]; and no human data exist, because the controlled trials of the three-herb product excluded pregnant and breastfeeding women [42] and Mills and colleagues’ evidence-based reference on herbs in pregnancy and lactation has no entry for Baptisia [43]. The manufacturer asks for professional supervision [2]; Chevallier and a conservative veterinary compilation say avoid it [11,22]. The position is precautionary and graded theoretical; it will be revisited if a measured cytisine content or human data appear.

15.5 Herb–drug interactions. No interaction study exists for Baptisia root. MediHerb refers users to its general herb–drug interaction chart [2], which was not read for this edition.

Drug or class Possible effect Grade Source
Cytisine (smoking-cessation medicine) Additive nicotinic effects (nausea, vomiting) from the shared alkaloid Theoretical [5,18]
Immunosuppressant drugs Opposing action, if the immune activity claimed for the herb is real Theoretical; no Baptisia data [2,16]
Antibiotics (doxycycline; "standard antibiotics" in bronchitis) No interaction reported when the three-herb product was given alongside them Clinical co-administration in two small studies of the product; not a pharmacokinetic study [16,17]

No interaction is graded above "theoretical" for Baptisia root itself.

15.6 Regulatory safety position in Australia. BAPTISIA TINCTORIA is a permissible ingredient (item 764) with no specific requirements, for purposes A and H [4]. The Poisons Standard (June 2026) lists cytisine in Schedule 3 (divided oral and oromucosal preparations with a recommended daily dose of 9 mg or less, as an aid to withdrawal from tobacco smoking in adults) and in Schedule 4 otherwise, and sparteine in Schedule 4 [5]. Section 7 of the Standard provides that a reference to a substance includes that substance "prepared from natural sources or artificially" [5]. Whether that reaches a whole-root extract in which cytisine is a minor constituent is a regulatory question for the TGA and Legal; the TGA’s listing of the plant without conditions suggests it has not treated Baptisia as a cytisine preparation. AIP comment: that is our reading, not advice. TGA safety alerts and DAEN. The searches that could not be completed in September 2026 were completed in October 2026 [48]. The TGA website search, which covers safety alerts, advisories, recalls and media releases, returned for "baptisia" only the two ARTG entries in section 12, for "esberitox" those two and the 2021 cancellation of ESBERITOX N, and for "wild indigo" nothing; a control term with a known 2026 safety alert returned that alert. No TGA safety alert, advisory or recall for Baptisia or the three-herb product was found. The DAEN search found the four reports set out in 15.1; the control term "echinacea" returned reports as expected, and "indigo" matched only the dye indigo carmine.

15.7 Children and older people. No safety data for Baptisia root in either group. No practitioner source read gives a paediatric dose of the root. The US label of the three-herb tablets gives 1 tablet three times a day at 7 years and under, 2 tablets from 8 to 12 years, and the adult dose over 12 years [42]; that is a manufacturer’s dose for the combination, not evidence of safety for Baptisia. Given the narrow dose range and the unknown cytisine content, Medicine advises against Baptisia root for children under 12 unless prescribed by a degree-qualified herbalist with competencies and adequate training in pharmacognosy.

15.8 Overdose. Expected: vomiting, purging, salivation, and at toxic doses convulsions and respiratory failure [10,13,18]. Treatment is supportive. Anyone who has swallowed a large amount of the root or extract needs emergency care; in Australia the Poisons Information Centre is on 13 11 26.

Referral. Anyone thinking of taking Baptisia root should consult a degree-qualified herbalist with competencies and adequate training in pharmacognosy.

Figure 15. Safety statements for Baptisia root, each with the grade of its basis and its source; no source reports a mea
Figure 15. Safety statements for Baptisia root, each with the grade of its basis and its source; no source reports a measured cytisine content for the root. AIP table-figure, 2026, from section 15 and refs 2, 3, 5, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 22, 42, 43 and 48.

26 more pages follow · 13,014 words, 28 figures, 18 tables

Still to come in this monograph

  1. 1. Nomenclature
  2. 2. Definition
  3. 3. Source and Australian supply
  4. 4. Macroscopy
  5. 5. Microscopy
  6. 6. Chemistry
  7. 7. Named markers and assay limits
  8. 8. TLC fingerprint
  9. 9. HPLC fingerprint
  10. 10. Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants
  11. 11. Traditional use
  12. 12. Current practice: use, preparations and doses
  13. 13. Clinical evidence
  14. 14. Pharmacology
  15. 16. Discussion
  16. 17. Conclusions
  17. 18. Research still needed
  18. 19. References
  19. 20. Document control

The rest of this monograph is open to members. One membership covers every members’ feature on the site.

Checking your membership…

Share this articleFacebookXLinkedInWhatsApp

Report an error or submit evidence

If something in this monograph is wrong, out of date or missing, tell us and show us the evidence. Every report is logged under the AIP Evidence Charter and assessed on the evidence alone; the outcome is kept on the record, and an upheld report is corrected with a dated notice on this page.

Open the report form

What kind of report is this?

A report without evidence is still logged, and closed as “no evidence lodged”.

We use your name and email only to acknowledge and answer this report. They are kept with the dispute record, are not shared, and are not published unless you tick the box above. The evidence you send may be published. See the Privacy Policy.

The Institute sets and publishes its own monographs. The catalogue is in Publications.