Bearberry leaf (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng.), Ericaceae
Australian Herbal Pharmacopoeia (working title) · Monograph AIP-PH-ARCUVA · Version 1.0 draft
Date: 2026
Status: working document, version 1.0. Not a statutory standard.
Prepared by: the Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy, Far North Queensland, Australia. Every author and contributor is named at the end of the monograph.

0. Free-teaser block
0.1 Identity card
| Monograph number | AIP-PH-ARCUVA (MediHerb A–Z list No. 13) |
| Title | Bearberry leaf (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng.), Uvae ursi folium |
| Version / year | 1.0 draft, 2026. Next review 2029, or sooner if the BRUMI trial reports or the Permissible Ingredients arbutin requirement changes |
| Accepted binomial | Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng., Syst. Veg., ed. 16, 2: 287 (1825). Accepted. IPNI 1024084-2; basionym Arbutus uva-ursi L., Sp. Pl. 1: 395 (1753), IPNI 17566-2. Checked in September 2026 against the Plants of the World Online / World Checklist of Vascular Plants data (ChecklistBank dataset version 2026-09-23) and IPNI [1,2] |
| Family | Ericaceae Juss. (APG IV), order Ericales [1] |
| Plant part | The dried leaf, whole or fragmented [3] |
| Latin drug name | Uvae ursi folium [3,4] |
| Principal synonyms | Homotypic: Arbutus uva-ursi L. (basionym), Mairania uva-ursi (L.) Desv., Uva-ursi procumbens Moench, Uva-ursi uva-ursi (L.) Cockerell ex Daniels. Heterotypic (42 in WCVP) include Arctostaphylos officinalis Wimm. & Grab., Arctostaphylos procumbens Patze, E.Mey. & Elkan and the infraspecific names subsp. adenotricha, coactilis, crassifolia and stipitata [1] |
| Common names | English: bearberry, uva-ursi, kinnikinnick, mountain box, red bearberry, hog cranberry [6]. German: Bärentraubenblätter; French: busserole, raisin d’ours; Spanish: gayuba; Italian: uva ursina [4,6] |
| Pharmacopoeial status elsewhere | Ph. Eur.: yes, monograph 1054 Bearberry leaf (the edition read, 8.0, text dated 07/2013) [3]. BP: yes [7]. USP–NF: no longer; official 1820 to 1950 [12]. WHO: yes, vol. 2 (2002) [6]. EMA/HMPC: yes, EU herbal monograph, traditional use, EMA/HMPC/750269/2016 (30/01/2018) [4]. BHP: yes (1983 and 1996, as cited by the HMPC) [5]. Commission E: positive monograph [5,9]. ESCOP: yes (2003, as cited) [5]. Japanese Pharmacopoeia: listed in the edition WHO cites [6] |
| Australian status | Permissible Ingredients Determination (No. 2) 2026, item 670 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI (purposes A, E, H): beta-arbutin is a mandatory component; for oral use the maximum recommended daily dose must not provide more than 500 mg beta-arbutin [14]. Items 5112 UVA URSI LEAF DRY and 5113 UVA URSI LEAF POWDER carry no requirement [14]. Poisons Standard (June 2026): the herb is not named; beta-arbutin is Schedule 4 in oral preparations except herbal preparations containing 500 mg or less per recommended daily dose, and Schedule 6 in other circumstances; hydroquinone is scheduled separately [15]. ARTG: 11 listed medicines name Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (search September 2026, same 11 in October 2026) [16]. Not native. Not a declared or restricted matter under the Queensland Biosecurity Regulation 2016. No wild records in the Atlas of Living Australia [17,18] |
| Named markers | Arbutin (hydroquinone β-D-glucopyranoside), CID 440936, C₁₂H₁₆O₇, M_r 272.3: identity (TLC) and assay marker, not less than 7.0 per cent anhydrous arbutin, dried drug, by HPLC (Ph. Eur. 1054) [3]. Gallic acid, CID 370: TLC identity reference [3]. Hydroquinone, CID 785: safety marker and the system-suitability partner in the assay; no limit is set on the leaf [3] |
| Evidence snapshot | Acute uncomplicated cystitis, symptom relief against placebo: Tier B, 1 RCT (n = 382), no effect found. Acute cystitis treated with bearberry instead of an immediate antibiotic, 1 RCT (n = 398): Tier A that recovery is worse (more incomplete recoveries) and Tier A that antibiotic courses fall; the signal towards more pyelonephritis is Tier B. A tier grades certainty, so these Tier A findings do not support using bearberry for acute cystitis. Prevention of recurrent cystitis: Tier C, 1 small combination RCT known second-hand. Mild recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms in women: Tier T, EU traditional use. Diuretic, anti-inflammatory, skin lightening: Tier P |
| Suggested citation | Ridley T, Iggulden L. Bearberry leaf (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng.), Uvae ursi folium. AIP-PH-ARCUVA, version 1.0 draft. Cardwell: Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy; 2026. DOI to be assigned |
| Provenance | Original AIP data: none. Every limit, method, analytical figure and trial result in this monograph belongs to the source cited beside it. Sections 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 carry AIP bench data pending: AIP has not vouchered a sample, cut a section, run a plate or run a chromatogram of this drug. Photographs and plates are licensed or public-domain works credited in each caption; F3b, F5 and F7 are AIP schematics redrawn from cited descriptions; F6c, F10b and F10d are AIP replots labelled "schematic redrawn from ref n"; F6b, F7b, F9, F10, F10c, F10e and F10f are AIP charts drawn from published data |
| Compiler and review | Compiled by Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research). Evidence and citation audit: Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research, all sections, figures and references), reviewed in 2026. Technical review: Dr Fiona MacAllister (Botanical, sections 1-5 and the adulterant species in 10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Hana Suzuki (QA, sections 6-10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Eleanor Whitcombe (Medicine, sections 12, 13, 15), reviewed in 2026. Layout and figure credits: Jesse Kirby (Community Outreach, figures F1–F10 and page design), reviewed in 2026. Published: not yet. Last modified: 2026. Version 1.0 draft |
| Canonical URL | /pharmacopoeia/arctostaphylos-uva-ursi/ (on publication) |
0.2 Summary
Bearberry leaf is the dried leaf of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, a trailing evergreen shrub of the boreal and mountain zones of Europe, northern Asia and North America. It has been used for bladder complaints since at least the thirteenth century, was official in the United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary from 1820 to 1950, and is official today in the European Pharmacopoeia. The drug is identified by its small obovate, coriaceous leaf with a finely sunken adaxial network, by an epidermis with anomocytic stomata on the lower surface only, and by a thin-layer chromatogram showing an intense blue arbutin zone. It is assayed by HPLC for arbutin, not less than 7.0 per cent of the dried drug. The leaf also carries 10 to 20 per cent tannin, which is why it upsets the stomach and why teas are made cold or by short infusion. The rationale is that arbutin reaches the urine as hydroquinone conjugates that bacteria can split. Two modern randomised trials tested bearberry-only products in women with acute cystitis. Against placebo it did not relieve symptoms; used instead of fosfomycin it cut antibiotic courses but left more women unrecovered, with a signal towards more kidney infections. The European Union accepts it only as a traditional medicine for mild recurrent symptoms in women, for one week at most. In Australia beta-arbutin is scheduled and oral herbal products are capped at 500 mg a day, below several European doses. Anyone considering bearberry should consult a degree-qualified herbalist with competencies and adequate training in pharmacognosy.

0.3 Contents with extent
| Section | Content | Pages (est.) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Free-teaser block: identity card, summary, contents, contributors | 4 |
| 1 | Nomenclature | 3 |
| 2 | Definition | 1 |
| 3 | Source and Australian supply, with 3.1 origin, climate and chemistry | 6 |
| 4 | Macroscopy | 3 |
| 5 | Microscopy | 3 |
| 6 | Chemistry | 5 |
| 7 | Named markers and assay limits | 3 |
| 8 | TLC fingerprint | 2 |
| 9 | HPLC fingerprint | 3 |
| 10 | Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants | 4 |
| 11 | Traditional use | 3 |
| 12 | Current practice: use, preparations and doses | 3 |
| 13 | Clinical evidence | 6 |
| 14 | Pharmacology | 4 |
| 15 | Safety and interactions | 5 |
| 16 | Discussion | 3 |
| 17 | Conclusions | 1 |
| 18 | Research still needed | 2 |
| 19 | References | 4 |
| 20 | Document control | 2 |
| Totals | 22 sections · about 66 pages · 46 figures (19 licensed or public-domain photographs, plates and journal figures, 13 PubChem structure panels, 3 AIP schematics redrawn from published descriptions, 10 AIP charts and replots of published data, 1 captioned placeholder) · 0 AIP photomicrographs · 0 AIP chromatograms · 24 tables · 3 randomised trials graded (2 bearberry-only, 1 combination) · 40 references, every PMID and DOI resolved in September 2026 and again in October 2026 |
Known gaps in this version, stated plainly.
- F4, the photomicrographs, is a captioned placeholder. AIP holds no vouchered sample. Wikimedia Commons and the Europe PMC open-access literature were searched in September 2026 for a reusable photomicrograph of bearberry leaf and none was found. Section 5 is written from the Ph. Eur. and WHO descriptions, and F5 is a drawing from them, labelled as one.
- No AIP plate or chromatogram. F7 is a zone-order schematic redrawn from the Ph. Eur. test; F8 is a published HPLC chromatogram reproduced under its CC BY licence. Both are somebody else’s work.
- The full report of the REGATTA trial’s results (Gágyor and colleagues, 2021) could not be retrieved by an automated session; the publisher’s site refused it. Its design is taken from the published protocol [27] and its trial-level results from the open-access individual-participant meta-analysis that re-analysed it [28]. The results paper is on the library fetch list.
- Several pharmacokinetic and toxicology papers reach this monograph through the HMPC assessment report [5] (Schindler 2002, Siegers 2003, Quintus 2005, Garcia de Arriba 2013, Chauhan 2007, the 2004 maculopathy case). The text names each and says it is reported through the assessment report; the primaries are on the fetch list.
- Searches not completed: ANZCTR, WHO ICTRP and Cochrane CENTRAL refused automated sessions on 30/09/2026; the TGA Database of Adverse Event Notifications is a report that returns nothing to a script; DAFF BICON import conditions and the CITES checklist were not queried successfully. Two NCBI Bookshelf entries (LiverTox, "Uva Ursi"; an IQWiG report on herbal remedies for recurrent cystitis) were behind a browser check and are not cited. Each of these needs a person with a browser.
- Nobody has tested the Australian market. No survey of arbutin content, hydroquinone content or species identity in Australian bearberry products was found.
0.4 Contributors and paywall notice
Prepared by: the Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy, Far North Queensland, Australia. Every author and contributor is named at the end of the monograph.
Contributors: listed with the monograph and resolved from the Legal byline roster by the publication pipeline for each department that reviews the draft. Dr Luke Iggulden, Chief Scientific Officer, is senior author: he set the scope of the Pharmacopoeia in the directive of 22/09/2026 and made the research possible.
What is free and what is not. Everything above the free-sample line is free to every reader. The remaining sections, macroscopy and microscopy, chemistry and markers, the identity tests, purity and adulterants, tradition, doses, graded evidence, pharmacology, safety and references, are read by Scholar-level members and above under a revocable personal licence. Nothing behind the line contradicts anything in front of it.
The Australian Herbal Pharmacopoeia is the name of a reference series published by the Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy. It is not a statutory standard under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 and carries no official, government or national-standard status.
Free to every reader. The safety section of every monograph is open to everyone, signed in or not. In an emergency call 000. For poisoning, call the Poisons Information Centre on 13 11 26.
15. Safety and interactions
Warning signs. Fever, rigors, loin or back pain, vomiting or blood in the urine during a bladder infection can mean the infection has reached the kidney. That needs medical assessment the same day and usually an antibiotic, and bearberry is no treatment for it; REGATTA’s excess of kidney infections in the bearberry-first group is the reason this matters (section 13).
15.1 Adverse effects
- Gastrointestinal: nausea, vomiting and stomach-ache, frequency unknown [4]; attributed to tannin [5,6]; possible after as little as 15 g leaf in sensitive people (Frohne 2004) [5]. Bone and Mills add cramping and constipation at high doses [9]. Irritability, insomnia and a raised heart rate have also been reported in association with bearberry leaf extract (NTP 2006, as reported by the HMPC) [5].
- Urine discolouration: greenish-brown urine that darkens in air, from oxidised hydroquinone [4,6,8]. Harmless, but worth warning about.
- Trials and volunteer studies: ATAFUTI recorded two serious adverse events, both hospital admissions (an abdominal-wall abscess and right iliac fossa pain) judged unlikely to be or not related to treatment, and no upper-tract infection [25]. In 16 healthy volunteers given a single dose, blood count, clotting, electrolytes, liver and kidney tests and urinalysis showed no abnormality attributed to the extract (Schindler 2002, as reported by the HMPC) [5]. In REGATTA pyelonephritis or febrile UTI occurred in 9 of 207 women given bearberry first against 2 of 191 given fosfomycin [28]: an effect of withholding the antibiotic more than a toxic effect, but a real harm of the strategy.
- Eye: bilateral bull’s-eye maculopathy with paracentral scotomas and retinal thinning in a 56-year-old woman who drank bearberry tea for three years to prevent UTI, dose unknown (Wang and Del Priore 2004), attributed to inhibition of melanin synthesis [5,9]. One case report; causality is possible (long exposure, plausible mechanism, no dechallenge data in the sources read).
- Kidney: albuminuria, haematuria and casts have been linked to bearberry use in a secondary source (Adesunloye 2003, via the NTP) [5]; not assessable from what AIP has read.
- Liver: "chronic liver impairment" with prolonged use is stated in Barnes and Gruenwald [5,8] without a case report behind it in the sources read.
- Australian reports. In its 2019–2020 arbutin scheduling papers the TGA reported that the Database of Adverse Event Notifications held 38 cases between 01/01/1971 and 01/09/2019 in which Arctostaphylos uva-ursi was a listed active ingredient of a suspected medicine, 33 of them with a single suspected medicine, and none for products with arbutin itself as the active ingredient [40]. The reactions were not itemised. The live database sits behind a terms-of-use page and could not be queried by script in September 2026; the cases since 2019 and their reaction terms still need reading by a person.
- TGA safety alerts. A search of the TGA website in September 2026 for bearberry, uva ursi and arbutin found the scheduling papers and no safety alert, recall or product alert [39,40]; the TGA’s own site search and the recalls database did not answer an automated session, so this check is incomplete. Repeat web searches in October 2026 and October 2026 again found the scheduling papers and no safety alert or recall; on both dates the TGA site search returned a bot-challenge page and the Database of Adverse Event Notifications stopped at its terms-of-use page, so neither could be read by script.
15.2 Toxicology
- Hydroquinone is the constituent of toxicological interest. Oral LD50 320 mg/kg in rats, 400 mg/kg in mice, 550 mg/kg in guinea pigs, 200 mg/kg in dogs and 70 mg/kg in cats (Woodard 1949, as reported by the HMPC) [5]. In the NTP two-year gavage study (25 and 50 mg/kg, 5 days a week), male F344 rats developed renal tubule adenomas (4/55 and 8/55 against 0/55) against a background of worsened chronic progressive nephropathy, female rats mononuclear-cell leukaemia, and female mice liver adenomas [5,6]. Hydroquinone is genotoxic in several in vitro and intraperitoneal in vivo assays; oral results are mostly negative or weak [5].
- Arbutin: not mutagenic in V79 cells unless pre-incubated with β-glucosidase; no bone-marrow micronuclei in mice at 0.5–2 g/kg orally (Müller and Kasper 1996) [5,9]. Subcutaneous 400 mg/kg/day before mating and through pregnancy reduced fetal weight in rats; 100 mg/kg/day had no effect (Itabashi 1988) [5,6]; the HMPC judged the study of limited relevance to oral use because of the route and dose [5].
- Leaf and extract: an aqueous extract was negative in TA98 and TA100 (only 2 of the 5 recommended strains); a 70 % ethanol extract was negative in a micronucleus test not done to ICH standard; there are no repeat-dose, carcinogenicity or reproductive studies of the leaf [5]. The HMPC declined an EU "list entry" because genotoxicity data are inadequate [5]. That is why bearberry remains a traditional-use product in the EU with a one-week limit.
- Exposure. Free hydroquinone after a clinical dose is a fraction of a per cent of the arbutin dose [5]. A published risk assessment (Garcia de Arriba 2013) put the free hydroquinone from a recommended dose at about 11 per cent of the permitted daily exposure and concluded the margin is adequate for short-term use; it reaches this monograph through the HMPC, which accepted it [5].
15.3 Contraindications and cautions
| Situation | Position | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy | Not recommended (EU) [4]; contraindicated (WHO, Commission E, MediHerb label) [6,9,10]; Bone and Mills: category C, avoid [9]; Barnes: avoid [8]. Barnes reports large doses as oxytocic [8] and Bone and Mills cite a minor theoretical risk from uterotonic activity of arbutin in vivo [9]; the isolated-uterus study found no uterotonic effect [5,8]. MediHerb’s own pregnancy table says "professional supervision" [10], which does not match its product entry | Theoretical and animal |
| Lactation | Not recommended [4]; contraindicated [6,10]; avoid [8,9] | Theoretical |
| Hypersensitivity to bearberry leaf | Contraindicated [4] | Expert consensus |
| Children | EU: not under 18 [4]; WHO and MediHerb: not under 12 [6,10]; Bone and Mills: not under 6 [9]. A UTI in a child needs diagnosis | Expert consensus |
| Men | Excluded from the EU traditional-use indication because a UTI in a man needs investigation [5] | Expert consensus |
| Kidney disorders | Contraindicated in the EU monograph and by WHO [4,6], and in the British Herbal Compendium as reported by Bone and Mills, who call it a theoretical caution without evidence [9] | Theoretical |
| Duration | No more than one week [4]; not for prolonged use [8,9,10] | Expert consensus, tannin and hydroquinone |
| Inflamed or ulcerated gut | Use cautiously [9,10] | Tannin, theoretical |
| Constipation, iron-deficiency anaemia, malnutrition | Prolonged use of high-tannin herbs inappropriate [9] | Tannin, theoretical |
| Symptoms lasting beyond 48 hours to 4 days, or worsening; fever, spasms, loin pain, blood in urine | Stop and seek assessment: EU after 4 days or at once with fever, dysuria, spasms or blood [4]; MediHerb and Barnes after 48 hours, and blood at once [8,10] | Expert consensus |

15.4 Interactions
| Interaction | Evidence | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Overall position | EU monograph: none reported [4]; Barnes: none documented [8] | – |
| Urine-acidifying foods or medicines reduce efficacy | WHO and Commission E advise against them [5,6]; based on the pH experiments, and the 2003 deconjugation work questions it [5,9] | Theoretical |
| CYP3A4/5/7 inhibition | In vitro only (Chauhan 2007); the HMPC assessment report says it should be carefully considered, and the EU monograph lists no interaction [4,5] | In vitro |
| Tannins bind iron, thiamine, alkaloids | Separate by at least 2 h [9,10] | Pharmacokinetic (class effect, clinical studies with tea) |
| Corticosteroids and indometacin (anti-inflammatory synergy) | Animal models [5,9] | Preclinical |
| β-lactams against MRSA | In vitro [9] | Preclinical |
| Anaesthesia | MediHerb advises stopping 7 days before [10] | Precautionary |
| Thiazide or loop diuretics | "Sodium-sparing" claim (Gruenwald) not included by the HMPC [5] | Unsupported |
15.5 Overdose
No case of overdose has been reported [4]. Overdose is said to cause bladder and urinary-mucosa irritation, dysuria, haematuria and liver damage (Gruenwald; Hänsel) [5]; ten times the dose, tinnitus, breathlessness, convulsions, collapse, delirium and vomiting (NTP) [5]. Barnes quotes 1 g hydroquinone (6–20 g leaf) as causing such symptoms and 5 g as fatal [8]. None of these is supported by a case report in the sources read [5].
Referral. Anyone considering bearberry, and anyone with urinary symptoms that are recurrent, in pregnancy, in a man or in a child, should consult a degree-qualified herbalist with competencies and adequate training in pharmacognosy, who will also recognise when investigation and antibiotic treatment are needed.

29 more pages follow · 14,470 words, 42 figures, 20 tables
Still to come in this monograph
- 1. Nomenclature
- 2. Definition
- 3. Source and Australian supply
- 4. Macroscopy
- 5. Microscopy
- 6. Chemistry
- 7. Named markers and assay limits
- 8. TLC fingerprint
- 9. HPLC fingerprint
- 10. Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants
- 11. Traditional use
- 12. Current practice: use, preparations and doses
- 13. Clinical evidence
- 14. Pharmacology
- 16. Discussion
- 17. Conclusions
- 18. Research still needed
- 19. References
- 20. Document control
The rest of this monograph is open to members. One membership covers every members’ feature on the site.
Checking your membership…
Report an error or submit evidence
If something in this monograph is wrong, out of date or missing, tell us and show us the evidence. Every report is logged under the AIP Evidence Charter and assessed on the evidence alone; the outcome is kept on the record, and an upheld report is corrected with a dated notice on this page.
Open the report form
The Institute sets and publishes its own monographs. The catalogue is in Publications.
