Australian Herbal Pharmacopoeia (working title), monograph AIP-PH-TERARJ (formerly AIP-HP 018)
Version: 1.0 draft
Date: 2026
Status: working document, version 1.0
Prepared by: the Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy, Far North Queensland, Australia. Every author and contributor is named at the end of the monograph.
0. Free-teaser block
0.1 Identity card
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Monograph | AIP-PH-TERARJ (formerly AIP-HP 018), Arjuna bark (Terminalia arjuna (Roxb. ex DC.) Wight & Arn.), Terminaliae arjunae cortex. Version 1.0 draft. Published 2026 (working document); next review 2029, or sooner if a major trial reports |
| Accepted name | Terminalia arjuna (Roxb. ex DC.) Wight & Arn., published 1834 in Wight and Arnott’s Prodromus Florae Peninsulae Indiae Orientalis, vol 1, p 314; accepted in the World Checklist of Vascular Plants 16.0 (the dataset behind Plants of the World Online), IPNI 170962-1, checked in September 2026 [1] |
| Family | Combretaceae (APG IV) |
| Plant part | Dried stem bark. Latin drug name Terminaliae arjunae cortex (a descriptive title in pharmacopoeial form; no pharmacopoeia we have read gives this drug a Latin title) |
| Main synonym | Pentaptera arjuna Roxb. ex DC. (basionym); eleven heterotypic synonyms in section 1 [1] |
| Common and traditional names | Arjuna, arjun, arjun myrobalan (English trade use); Sanskrit arjuna, kakubha, pārtha, śvetavāha; Hindi arjuna; Tamil marudam; Telugu maddi [2, 11] |
| Pharmacopoeial status elsewhere | Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I, Vol. II (1999), monograph 8, Arjuna (stem bark) [2]. No monograph in the Ph. Eur. 8th edition [18] or in WHO Monographs on Selected Medicinal Plants vols 1-4. BP, USP-NF, Chinese Pharmacopoeia and EMA/HMPC: no monograph known to us; not confirmed against current editions. British Herbal Pharmacopoeia: not checked (the AIP reference library holds only a two-page summary of it, without monographs) |
| Australian status | Permissible Ingredients Determination (No. 2) 2026, Schedule 1, item 4870 TERMINALIA ARJUNA: active ingredient only, oral use only, bark only, maximum recommended daily dose 6 g dried bark or extract equivalent, label warnings "Not recommended for use by pregnant and lactating women" and "Not suitable for children" [3]. Not in any Schedule of the Poisons Standard June 2026 [4]. Not native to Australia and not recorded as naturalised [1, 8]. Not prohibited or restricted matter under Queensland biosecurity law [5]. Not CITES-listed [6]. ARTG product entries not checked in this version |
| Named markers | Identity: arjunic acid (CID 15385516), arjungenin (CID 12444386), arjunetin (CID 21152828) by HPTLC [15]; ellagic acid (CID 5281855) and gallic acid (CID 370) by HPLC [14]. No assay limit set by any pharmacopoeia; AIP limit to be set, AIP bench data pending |
| Purity limits in force elsewhere | Foreign matter not more than 2 per cent; total ash not more than 25 per cent; acid-insoluble ash not more than 1 per cent; alcohol-soluble and water-soluble extractives each not less than 20 per cent [2] |
| Evidence snapshot | Chronic stable angina: Tier C, 5 small studies in one systematic review, very low certainty [22]. Chronic heart failure (add-on): Tier C, 2 RCTs, very low certainty [23, 24]. LVEF in healthy adults, one proprietary aqueous extract: Tier B, 1 RCT, low certainty, not carried over to other preparations [26]. Lipids, exercise capacity, type 2 diabetes: Tier C, single small trials [9, 25, 28]. Heart disease, wounds and fractures in Ayurveda: Tier T [2]. Cardioprotection and CYP inhibition: Tier P [9, 15] |
| Main safety point | Extracts inhibit CYP3A4, CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 in human liver microsomes [15], and bark powder prolonged prothrombin time in rabbits and in one old uncontrolled patient series [9], so warfarin and antiplatelet users need monitoring (section 15); people using this drug are usually already taking cardiac medicines. Not for pregnancy, lactation or children under the Australian listing conditions [3] |
| Suggested citation | Ridley T, Iggulden L. AIP-PH-TERARJ: Arjuna bark (Terminalia arjuna (Roxb. ex DC.) Wight & Arn.), Terminaliae arjunae cortex. Australian Herbal Pharmacopoeia (working title). Version 1.0 draft. Cardwell (Qld): AIP; 2026. DOI to be assigned |
| Compiler and review | Compiled by Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research). Technical review: Dr Fiona MacAllister (Botanical, sections 1-5, 10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Hana Suzuki (QA, sections 6-10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Eleanor Whitcombe (Medicine, sections 12, 13, 15), reviewed in 2026; Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research, citation and evidence audit of all sections, references and figures), reviewed in 2026; Jesse Kirby (Community Outreach, figure placement, captions, credit lines and page layout), reviewed in 2026. Published: not yet. Last modified: 2026. Version 1.0 draft |
| Provenance | Original AIP data: none. Every analytical, clinical and botanical statement comes from the cited pharmacopoeia, literature or database; sections 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 carry "AIP bench data pending" |
| Canonical URL | /pharmacopoeia/terminalia-arjuna/ (on publication) |

0.2 Summary
Arjuna is the stem bark of Terminalia arjuna, a large riverside tree of the Indian subcontinent and Sri Lanka, and the best-known heart remedy of Ayurveda [1, 2, 9]. The drug arrives as flat to channelled pieces of bark, grey and fairly smooth outside, pinkish and fibrous inside, bitter and astringent to taste. Under the microscope it shows a thin cork, a wide secondary phloem with rows of fibre groups, and large numbers of calcium oxalate rosettes and crystal idioblasts [2]. Chemically it is a tannin drug with a small triterpene fraction: an aqueous extract was 44 per cent polyphenols and under 1 per cent triterpenes [14]. No pharmacopoeia sets an assay; identity rests on macroscopy, microscopy and a published HPTLC system that resolves arjunic acid, arjungenin and arjunetin [2, 15]. The one official standard, the Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, gives ash and extractive limits only [2].
The clinical evidence is thin. Five small, high-risk-of-bias studies in stable angina gave no significant pooled benefit [22]; two heart-failure trials suggest improvement in NYHA class without a clear change in ejection fraction [23, 24]; single trials in healthy adults and in diabetes are small or maker-funded [25, 26, 28]. The main safety point is interaction: extracts inhibit three major CYP enzymes in vitro [15], bark powder lengthened prothrombin time in rabbits and in a small uncontrolled patient series [9], and the people who take arjuna are usually on cardiac drugs, warfarin among them.
0.3 Contents with extent
| Section | Pages (approx.) |
|---|---|
| 0 Free-teaser block | 4 |
| 1 Nomenclature | 0.7 |
| 2 Definition | 0.3 |
| 3 Source and Australian supply; 3.1 origin, climate and chemistry | 3 |
| 4 Macroscopy | 2.5 |
| 5 Microscopy | 2 |
| 6 Chemistry | 2 |
| 7 Named markers and assay limits | 1 |
| 8 TLC fingerprint | 1.5 |
| 9 HPLC fingerprint | 1.5 |
| 10 Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants | 2 |
| 11 Traditional use | 0.5 |
| 12 Current practice | 1.5 |
| 13 Clinical evidence | 5 |
| 14 Pharmacology | 1 |
| 15 Safety | 1.5 |
| 16-18 Discussion, conclusions, research needed | 3 |
| 19 References | 1.5 |
| 20 Document control | 1.5 |
Totals: @@PAGES@@ printed A4 pages in the current layout; 16 figures (15 images plus 1 captioned slot awaiting AIP bench work); 0 AIP photomicrographs; 1 published HPLC chromatogram reproduced under CC BY 4.0 (not an AIP run); TLC shown as a schematic redrawn from published Rf values; 14 tables; 12 clinical studies described and graded by outcome (4 read in full as primary reports, 8 through full-text systematic reviews or reference books) and 3 systematic reviews read in full; 43 references.
Gaps listed openly: F4 (AIP photomicrographs) is pending: no licensed photomicrograph of this drug was found in Wikimedia Commons or in the open-access papers read for this version, and none will be drawn to look like a specimen. F7 is a schematic redrawn from published Rf values; an AIP plate is pending. F8 is a published chromatogram from another laboratory’s method; an AIP chromatogram is pending.
0.4 Contributors and access
Prepared by the Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy. Every author, reviewer and contributor is named at the end of the monograph. A preview of the monograph and all of section 15 (Safety) are free to every reader; the full text is for Scholar members and above, or the AUD $20 copy of this one title.
Free to every reader. The safety section of every monograph is open to everyone, signed in or not. In an emergency call 000. For poisoning, call the Poisons Information Centre on 13 11 26.
15. Safety
Adverse effects in trials. Across two angina studies with 78 participants, the systematic review counted 15 adverse events: constipation 4, headache 3, body ache 3, abdominal discomfort 2, and one each of dizziness, pedal oedema and transient cardiac failure [22]. The review does not say which two studies, so these events cannot be tied to a preparation, and one of its studies tested a multi-herb product. In the long-term coronary cohort, gastritis (2) and constipation (1) were the only effects reported over up to 4 years 9 months, with no change in blood count or liver and kidney tests [29]. No adverse events related to the intervention were reported in the healthy-adult trial [26]; liver tests did not deteriorate in the diabetes trial, and no adverse effect was recorded in its arjuna arm [28]. A review chapter summarises mild gastritis, headache and constipation, and no metabolic, renal or hepatic toxicity over more than 24 months [9]. Grade: clinical data, very low certainty; small numbers, short follow-up in most trials, and no rare adverse event could have been detected.
Case reports. None found in the sources read for this version. Stockley’s Drug Interactions (8th edition, 2008) has no arjuna monograph and names T. arjuna only as one ingredient of the multi-herb product Liv.52, in an alcohol interaction [41].
Toxicology. Rats and rabbits given bark at 10 g/kg orally for 40 days showed no histopathological change in heart, liver or kidney; the intraperitoneal LD50 of an extract in mice was 2.5 g/kg [9]. An acute oral study found no toxicity at a limit dose of 2000 mg/kg of ethanolic extract; one animal study found lower thyroid hormone levels and higher hepatic lipid peroxidation with high doses of bark extract, which a review interprets as a reason to avoid high intakes [12]. These two findings are reported from a review; the primary papers were not read for this version.
Contraindications. None established. Conditions for which arjuna is used (angina, heart failure, hypertension) require medical diagnosis and management; the bark is an adjunct only.
Herb-drug interactions.
| Interacting drug or class | Basis | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Drugs cleared by CYP3A4, CYP2D6 or CYP2C9 (for example many statins and calcium-channel blockers, metoprolol and other β-blockers metabolised by CYP2D6, warfarin through CYP2C9) | extracts inhibit all three enzymes in human liver microsomes [15] | in vitro; no clinical study |
| Warfarin, other anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs | prothrombin time rose in rabbits given bark powder 10 g/kg (20 against 10 s) [9]; in an uncontrolled clinical series of 12 patients with angina and hemiplegia after cerebral thrombosis, given 20 g of bark powder in divided doses over a month, about 80 per cent had a longer prothrombin time (24.3 ± 2.65 against 13.4 ± 1.22 s) [9]; the alcoholic extract did not change prothrombin time in animals [9] | animal and uncontrolled clinical data (secondary report of an old series); a pharmacodynamic interaction is plausible and potentially serious; no controlled study |
| Antihypertensives, nitrates, antianginals, heart-failure drugs | trials used arjuna as an add-on to these drugs [22, 29]; blood pressure fell in some [9, 25] | theoretical additive effect; no adverse interaction reported in the trials |
| Thyroid hormones | lower thyroid hormone levels in an animal study [12] | theoretical, animal only |
| Glucose-lowering drugs (metformin, sulfonylureas, insulin and others) | bark powder 2 g/day added to metformin lowered fasting glucose and HbA1c about as much as sitagliptin did [28] | clinical, one open trial; additive glucose lowering expected; no hypoglycaemia reported |
AIP comment (Medicine): the prothrombin-time data are old and uncontrolled, but the effect reported was large, and the people who take arjuna are those most likely to be on warfarin or antiplatelet drugs. Anyone on warfarin or another anticoagulant should not start arjuna without an INR check arranged with the prescriber within the first week or two and after any change of dose. Anyone on a narrow-therapeutic-index drug, a combination of cardiac medicines or glucose-lowering drugs should use it only with monitoring arranged with the prescriber. Tell the surgical or dental team before a procedure. Stockley’s (2008) is silent on arjuna [41]; that silence means the interaction has not been studied.
Pregnancy. No human or animal reproductive-toxicity data were found in the sources read. The evidence-based pregnancy and lactation reference held in the AIP reference library has no arjuna entry [42]. A listed medicine containing the bark must carry "Not recommended for use by pregnant and lactating women" [3]. Grade: no data; the regulatory warning applies; not recommended.
Lactation. No data on transfer into breast milk or on effects in the breastfed infant [42]. The same label warning applies [3]. Grade: no data; the regulatory warning applies; not recommended.
Children. No data. A listed medicine must carry "Not suitable for children" [3]. Older people. Trial participants were mostly middle-aged and older adults with heart disease [22, 29]; no age-specific signal was reported.
Overdose. No human overdose reports found.
TGA safety information. The TGA website was searched in September 2026 for "arjuna" (4 results: three ARTG product entries and one product cancelled at the sponsor’s request) and "Terminalia" (72 results: 68 ARTG entries, 3 articles, 1 consultation). Neither search returned a safety alert, recall, product-defect notice or medicine safety advisory for arjuna [43]. The Database of Adverse Event Notifications (medicines) opens behind an interactive terms page and a report viewer that could not be driven by the automated search in September 2026; a manual search for "arjuna" and "Terminalia" remains an open action (section 20). Until it is done, the absence of Australian adverse-event reports is unconfirmed.
Contamination risk. See section 10: metal contamination of Ayurvedic products [20] makes a heavy-metal result on every lot part of safe use.
Referral. Where arjuna is considered alongside heart medicines, consult a degree-qualified herbalist with competencies and adequate training in pharmacognosy.
28 more pages follow · 14,069 words, 14 figures, 12 tables
Still to come in this monograph
- 1. Nomenclature
- 2. Definition
- 3. Source and Australian supply
- 3.1 Where it must be grown: origin, climate and chemistry
- 4. Macroscopy
- 5. Microscopy
- 6. Chemistry
- 7. Named markers and assay limits
- 8. TLC fingerprint
- 9. HPLC fingerprint
- 10. Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants
- 11. Traditional use
- 12. Current practice: use, preparations and doses
- 13. Clinical evidence
- 14. Pharmacology
- 16. Discussion
- 17. Conclusions
- 18. Research still needed
- 19. References
- 20. Document control
The rest of this monograph is open to members. One membership covers every members’ feature on the site.
Checking your membership…
Report an error or submit evidence
If something in this monograph is wrong, out of date or missing, tell us and show us the evidence. Every report is logged under the AIP Evidence Charter and assessed on the evidence alone; the outcome is kept on the record, and an upheld report is corrected with a dated notice on this page.
Open the report form
The Institute sets and publishes its own monographs. The catalogue is in Publications.
