Barberry bark (Berberis vulgaris L.), Berberidaceae
Australian Herbal Pharmacopoeia (working title) · Monograph AIP-PH-BERVUL · Version 1.0 draft
Date: 2026
Status: working document, version 1.0. Not a statutory standard.
Prepared by: the Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy, Far North Queensland, Australia. Every author and contributor is named at the end of the monograph.

0. Free-teaser block
0.1 Identity card
| Register number | AIP-PH-BERVUL (MediHerb A–Z list No. 12) |
| Title | Barberry bark (Berberis vulgaris L.), Berberidis cortex |
| Version / year | 1.0 draft, 2026. Next review 2029, or sooner if a controlled trial of the bark itself reports, or if an Australian regulator acts on berberine |
| Accepted binomial | Berberis vulgaris L., Species Plantarum: 330 (1753). Accepted in the World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP) version 16.0, read through ChecklistBank in September 2026 and again in October 2026; IPNI 328527-2 [2] |
| Family | Berberidaceae, order Ranunculales, as placed in APG IV, which WCVP follows for flowering-plant families [2,3,54]; no family change affects the genus |
| Plant part | Dried bark of the root, with or without the bark of the stem and larger branches. MediHerb lists the part as "Bark" [4]; Bone and Mills give "root or stem bark" and note that commercial root bark may contain branch and stem bark [3] |
| Latin drug name | Berberidis cortex [3]; Berberidis radicis cortex where the drug is root bark only [5] |
| Principal synonyms | Berberis racemosa Stokes (homotypic; an illegitimate, superfluous name) [2]. Two subspecies are accepted besides the type: subsp. australis (Boiss.) Heywood and subsp. seroi O.Bolòs & Vigo [2] |
| Common names | English: barberry, common barberry, European barberry, jaundice berry, pipperidge. German: Berberitze, Sauerdorn. French: épine-vinette, vinettier. Italian: berberi. Danish: almindelig berberis [3,5] |
| Pharmacopoeial status elsewhere | British Herbal Pharmacopoeia 1996: yes, "Barberry Bark", as listed by Trease and Evans [6]; the 1983 edition carried it too [3]. UK General Sale List: yes [3,6]. German Commission E: negative monograph [3]. Ph. Eur.: no monograph for the bark in the 8.0 edition read [7]. No USP–NF, WHO, EMA/HMPC, Japanese or Chinese monograph for this species was found in the sources read |
| Australian status | Permissible Ingredients Determination: yes, item 829 BERBERIS VULGARIS, purposes A, E and H, no requirements in column 4 [8]. Poisons Standard: neither the plant nor berberine is named [9]. Introduced: 41 Atlas of Living Australia records, from New South Wales, Tasmania, the ACT and South Australia, none from Queensland [10]; described as sparingly naturalised on the southern tablelands of New South Wales and possibly in Tasmania, and an alternate host of wheat stem rust [11]. Not named in the Biosecurity Regulation 2016 (Qld) [12]. Not native, so no Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld) permit applies |
| Named markers | Berberine (CID 2353): identity (TLC) and assay (HPLC) marker; no limit set by any pharmacopoeia for this drug; reported at up to 6 per cent of root bark and 2.44 per cent of whole dried root (as berberine chloride) [3,13]. Palmatine (CID 19009) and jatrorrhizine (CID 72323): identity only, no limit. An AIP berberine limit is proposed as research (sections 7, 18) |
| Evidence snapshot | Barberry root preparation in antipsychotic-induced metabolic syndrome: Tier C, 1 RCT (88 analysed), very low certainty, no benefit [14]. Isolated berberine for type 2 diabetes and blood lipids: Tier B for berberine only, many RCTs, low certainty, not transferable to the bark at practitioner doses [15,16]. Isolated berberine for acute infectious diarrhoea: Tier B for berberine only, 38 RCTs, low certainty [17]. Bitter tonic, cholagogue and "sluggish liver", topical mouth and eye use: Tier T [3,4,18]. Antimicrobial and metabolic mechanisms: Tier P [3]. Two further root trials in type 2 diabetes are known and not graded (section 13). No controlled trial has tested the bark as Australian practitioners dispense it |
| Suggested citation | Ridley T, Iggulden L. Barberry bark (Berberis vulgaris L.), Berberidis cortex. AIP-PH-BERVUL, version 1.0 draft. Cardwell: Australian Institute of Pharmacognosy; 2026. DOI to be assigned |
| Provenance | Original AIP data: none. Every analytical figure, limit, method and trial result belongs to the source cited beside it. Sections 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 carry AIP bench data pending (no AIP voucher, section, plate or run yet). The distribution map (Figure 9), charts (Figures 10 to 13) and drawings (Figures 5 and 6) are AIP drawings from cited data |
| Compiler and review | Compiled by Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research). Technical review: Dr Fiona MacAllister (Botanical, sections 1-5, 10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Hana Suzuki (QA, sections 6-10), reviewed in 2026; Dr Eleanor Whitcombe (Medicine, sections 12, 13, 15), reviewed in 2026; Dr Thomas Ridley (Education and Research, evidence and citation audit of the whole document, done by the compiler and so not independent), reviewed in 2026; Jesse Kirby (Community Outreach, whole-document layout, figure placement, captions and credit lines), reviewed in 2026. Published: not yet. Last modified: 2026. Version 1.0 draft |
| Canonical URL | /pharmacopoeia/berberis-vulgaris/ (on publication) |

0.2 Summary
Barberry bark is the dried bark of the root, and sometimes of the stem, of the common or European barberry, a spiny deciduous shrub native from Europe to western and northern Iran. It is imported into Australia. The plant is sparingly naturalised in south-eastern Australia and is an alternate host of wheat stem rust, so it has no place in a Queensland planting.
The drug is bright yellow inside and intensely bitter because of its isoquinoline alkaloids, chiefly berberine, with palmatine, jatrorrhizine, magnoflorine and the bisbenzylisoquinolines berbamine and oxyacanthine. Berberine is the identity and assay marker, but no pharmacopoeia in force sets a limit for it in this drug, and published contents range over several hundredfold between parts, origins and methods.
Australian practitioners use a 1:2 liquid extract at 20 to 40 mL a week as a bitter tonic and cholagogue, and topically for mouth ulcers, skin and eyes. That use rests on Eclectic and British tradition. The large clinical literature concerns isolated berberine at 0.9 to 1.5 g a day, many times what bark supplies; the one trial of a barberry root preparation graded here found no benefit, and two further root trials in type 2 diabetes have not yet been graded. Berberine raises ciclosporin levels and inhibits CYP2D6, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, and the drug is contraindicated in pregnancy, breastfeeding and neonatal jaundice.
0.3 Contents with extent
| Section | Extent (A4 pages, estimated for the first printing) |
|---|---|
| 0 Free-teaser block | 4 |
| 1 Nomenclature | 1 |
| 2 Definition | 1 |
| 3 Source and Australian supply, with 3.1 origin, climate and chemistry | 3 |
| 4 Macroscopy | 3 |
| 5 Microscopy | 2 |
| 6 Chemistry | 2 |
| 7 Named markers and assay limits | 1 |
| 8 TLC fingerprint | 2 |
| 9 HPLC fingerprint | 2 |
| 10 Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants | 2 |
| 11 Traditional use | 2 |
| 12 Current practice | 2 |
| 13 Clinical evidence | 3 |
| 14 Pharmacology | 2 |
| 15 Safety | 3 |
| 16–18 Discussion, conclusions, research needed | 3 |
| 19 References | 3 |
| 20 Document control | 2 |
| Totals (draft) | 44 A4 pages as printed for this draft. 33 embedded figures: 12 licensed or public-domain photographs (3 of the crude drug), 10 public-domain plates and drawings, 1 licensed photomicrograph (genus level), 1 licensed HPTLC plate and 2 licensed HPLC chromatograms (all of B. vulgaris material), 1 AIP composite of PubChem structures and 6 AIP drawings and charts. About 20 tables. 0 AIP photomicrographs, 0 AIP chromatograms, 0 AIP plates. 1 trial of the drug graded with RoB 2 and 4 outcomes graded with GRADE; berberine and fruit evidence summarised from systematic reviews; 3 trial registers searched (ClinicalTrials.gov, ANZCTR, WHO ICTRP) and the TGA adverse-event database searched. 60 numbered references |
Gaps stated plainly. AIP holds no voucher, photomicrograph, TLC plate or chromatogram of barberry bark. No pharmacopoeia in force publishes a microscopy, TLC or assay standard for this species, so sections 5, 8 and 9 rest on a genus-level anatomy paper, pharmacopoeial berberine methods written for goldenseal and Coptis, and two published analyses of B. vulgaris root. The one randomised trial of a barberry root preparation graded here is small and its preparation was not characterised. Three more are known: root-extract trials in opiate withdrawal and in type 2 diabetes, both being obtained in full text, and a type 2 diabetes trial of capsules whose content cannot be identified from the paper; none is graded. Four registered root or extract studies have no results found in PubMed. The trial registers and the TGA adverse-event database were searched in September 2026 (sections 13 and 15). The Commonwealth import conditions for dried barberry bark have not been read and are to be confirmed before any AIP import.
0.4 Contributors and access
Compiled by Dr Thomas Ridley, Head of Education and Research. Dr Fiona MacAllister, Head of Botanical, has reviewed sections 1–5 and 10 (names, sources, figures and adulterant species). Dr Hana Suzuki, Head of Botanical QA, has reviewed sections 6–10 (constituents, markers, limits, TLC and HPLC methods, purity and contaminant tests, and Figures 6 to 8b). Dr Eleanor Whitcombe, Head of Medicine, has reviewed sections 12, 13 and 15 (doses, trial grading, registry and adverse-event searches, safety and interactions, and Figures 10, 11 and 13). Dr Thomas Ridley, Head of Education and Research, has audited every reference, PMID and DOI and the evidence record against the sources; he is also the compiler, so that audit is not independent, and the Librarian’s reference audit remains the independent check. Jesse Kirby, Head of Community Outreach, has reviewed the layout of the whole document: where each figure sits, its caption and its credit line against the image record, and the printed page design. The History and Philosophy check of section 11 is pending, as are the Librarian’s reference audit and Legal’s advice before release. Dr Luke Iggulden, Chief Scientific Officer, is senior author: he set the scope of the pharmacopoeia series and made the research possible. A preview of the monograph and all of section 15 (Safety) are free to every reader; the full text is for Scholar members and above, or the AUD $20 copy of this one title.
Free to every reader. The safety section of every monograph is open to everyone, signed in or not. In an emergency call 000. For poisoning, call the Poisons Information Centre on 13 11 26.
15. Safety
Adverse effects in trials. In the one trial of a root preparation, 12 of the barberry group and 6 of the placebo group left for non-compliance or side effects; the side effects were not listed, and the protocol excluded anyone who developed one, so the trial cannot tell us how often harms occur [14]. In berberine trials the common effects are gastrointestinal: constipation, flatulence and abdominal discomfort; in two trials reported together (one against metformin, one open add-on) 34.5 per cent had gastrointestinal effects, mostly in the first four weeks [3]. Commission E listed dizziness, nosebleeds, breathlessness, skin and eye irritation, gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, diarrhoea, nephritis and urinary disorders at berberine doses above 500 mg [3].
Case reports. Bone and Mills found no adverse reaction documented for barberry itself [3]. A Swiss case of acquired long QT and torsades de pointes involved a 56-year-old woman who had taken hemp oil (cannabidiol and cannabigerol) for 4 months, at up to six times the recommended dose, and had added a 250 mg berberine supplement for about 6 weeks; the QT normalised within 5 days of stopping all supplements [44]. Causality for berberine alone is possible at most, because the cannabinoids were taken in excess at the same time.
Toxicology. Oral LD50 of powdered B. vulgaris root in mice, 2600 mg/kg; of a barberry root extract fraction, 520 mg/kg in mice and 1280 mg/kg in rats; of berberine in mice, 329 mg/kg orally and 23 mg/kg intraperitoneally [45]. A hydro-ethanolic root bark extract, prepared as a homoeopathic mother tincture, caused no deaths at 2000 µL/kg and no adverse change over 28 days at up to 1000 µL/kg/day in rats, but caused malformations in zebrafish embryos at high concentration [46]; doses were given by volume of a tincture whose strength is not stated as a drug ratio, so they cannot be converted to bark. Berberine hydrochloride was weakly mutagenic in Salmonella TA98 without metabolic activation and inactive with it [3]. A 2026 European review of the wider literature found in vitro evidence of gene mutation and chromosomal damage by berberine, not yet tested in vivo, and found no eligible genotoxicity or mammalian toxicity study of B. vulgaris root or bark itself [60]. Under UVA, berberine damaged keratinocytes and lens epithelial cells in vitro, and eyewashes containing berberine are best used out of bright sunlight [3].
Contraindications.
- Pregnancy. Contraindicated by MediHerb [4]; "best avoided" (Bone and Mills) [3]; contraindicated in early pregnancy by the BHP 1983 [3]. The basis is berberine’s displacement of bilirubin from albumin [3,5], a review naming barberry and its protoberberine alkaloids as uterine stimulants [5], uterine contraction with berberine in experimental models, and increased contractility of isolated uterus with an alcohol extract of Berberis branch and stem bark [3]. Bone and Mills note that ten berberine-containing extracts stimulated or relaxed isolated uterus without relation to their berberine content [3]. In rats fed berberine chloride dihydrate from gestational day 6 to 20, the maternal no-observed-adverse-effect level was 282 mg/kg a day, and the developmental no-observed-adverse-effect level 531 mg/kg a day with the lowest effect level at 1313 mg/kg a day; a gavage follow-up suggested the developmental level could be raised to about 1100 mg/kg a day [3]. Mills and colleagues rate the kernicterus concern evidence level 3 and the uterine-stimulant concern level 4 on their scale [5]. Grade: animal and in vitro; no human pregnancy data.
- Breastfeeding and neonatal jaundice. Contraindicated by MediHerb [4]. Berberine displaced bilirubin from albumin about ten times more strongly than phenylbutazone in vitro and lowered bilirubin protein binding in rats given it by injection [3,5]; kernicterus in premature Chinese infants has been linked with Coptis, directly, across the placenta or through breast milk, although later animal data dispute the link [3]. Whether berberine passes into human milk has not been measured in the sources read. Grade: animal, in vitro and contested observational.
- G6PD deficiency in newborns. Singapore banned Coptis and berberine in 1978 after cases of neonatal jaundice and kernicterus in G6PD-deficient babies; they stayed under the Poisons Act until 2013, when the Health Sciences Authority lifted the prohibition after reviewing the evidence [47]. Grade: observational, contested.
- Gallstones. Caution, because of the possibility of impacted stones and obstructed bile ducts with a cholagogue [4]. Grade: theoretical.
- General anaesthesia. MediHerb advises stopping 7 days before [4]. Grade: precautionary.
- Diarrhoea. The BHP 1983 listed diarrhoea as a contraindication; Bone and Mills judge this "probably not valid", since berberine is used to treat diarrhoea [3].
Interactions.
| Drug | Effect | Evidence | Grade | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ciclosporin | Blood levels raised: +29.3 per cent in 52 kidney-transplant patients on 600 mg/day berberine (randomised, placebo-controlled); +34.5 per cent in a 6-patient pharmacokinetic study; higher levels and lower dose needs in heart-transplant recipients. One study of 6 healthy men found no rise at 600 mg/day for 10 days, and another 6 showed a rise at 300 mg/day | Clinical | Clinical (berberine); consistent in patients | [3] |
| Substrates of CYP2D6, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 (probes used: dextromethorphan, losartan, midazolam) | In 17 healthy men (randomised, placebo-controlled crossover), berberine 300 mg three times a day for 2 weeks raised the dextromethorphan metabolic ratio ninefold, doubled the losartan ratio and raised midazolam AUC by 40 per cent | Pharmacokinetic study | PK study (berberine) | [48] |
| CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 substrates | Berberine is a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP2D6 (KI 2.7 µM) and CYP3A4/5 (KI 14.8 µM) in human liver microsomes | In vitro | Theoretical | [49] |
| Digoxin and other P-glycoprotein substrates | Berberine raised oral digoxin and ciclosporin bioavailability in rats | Animal | Theoretical | [3] |
| Glucose-lowering drugs and insulin | Additive glucose lowering, from berberine trial effects | Pharmacodynamic | Theoretical | [16,43] |
| QT-prolonging drugs | hERG inhibition in vitro; one confounded case report | Case report, in vitro | Theoretical | [43,44] |
| Drugs that displace bilirubin from albumin | May add to bilirubin displacement | In vitro and animal | Theoretical | [3,4] |
AIP comment (Medicine): every clinical interaction above was shown with isolated berberine at 300 to 900 mg a day. Bark at 1.5 to 3 g a day supplies an estimated 37 to 180 mg (section 12). The interactions are probably weaker with the herb. Nobody has tested the herb, and the low end of the ciclosporin data (300 mg a day) is within about two- to fourfold of the 73 to 180 mg estimated for the top practitioner dose, so the cautions stand. Ciclosporin and other narrow-therapeutic-index drugs cleared by CYP3A4, CYP2D6 or CYP2C9 (for example tacrolimus, warfarin and phenytoin) are the combinations to avoid without drug-level monitoring; for other substrates, monitoring is enough. Patients who take a berberine supplement as well as the herb should be treated as taking berberine at trial doses.
Children and older people. Berberine has been given to children with diarrhoea and giardiasis in trials, and Bone and Mills advise avoiding use in neonates and very young children [3]. Older people are more likely to take the interacting drugs listed above [43].
Overdose. A teaspoonful of powdered root bark acts as a purgative [18]. Commission E knew of no poisoning with barberry, and of possible deaths from berberine [3].
Regulatory safety notices. The Permissible Ingredients Determination sets no warning statement for B. vulgaris, although the entry for B. aristata requires the pregnancy warning "Not recommended for use by pregnant and lactating women" [8]. AIP comment: this is inconsistent, since the two barks carry the same alkaloid; practitioners should apply the pregnancy and lactation contraindication to both. A search of the TGA website in September 2026 for "berberine" (59 results), "Berberis" (125) and "Berberis vulgaris" (48) found ARTG entries, sponsor cancellations and one ingredient-name notice, and no safety alert, safety advisory or Medicines Safety Update item [56].
Australian adverse-event reports. The TGA Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN – medicines), data to 15/09/2026, was searched in September 2026 [57]. "Barberry" matched no medicine. "Berberis vulgaris" matched 21 medicines, all multi-ingredient listed products, with 45 reports (36 naming a single suspected medicine) and no reported death; the commonest terms were nausea (9), vomiting (7), diarrhoea (6), abdominal pain (5), headache (5) and urticaria (4). "Berberine" matched 7 medicines (mostly B. aristata products) with 20 reports and no death: vomiting (6), diarrhoea (5), nausea (3), liver injury (3, none with a single suspected medicine), constipation (2) and drug interaction (2). Spontaneous reports cannot establish cause or frequency, and none of these products is barberry bark alone. Grade: spontaneous reports; the pattern matches the gastrointestinal effects seen in berberine trials.
Overseas regulatory review (European Union; no standing in Australia). At the European Commission’s request, the European Food Safety Authority’s Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens endorsed a draft opinion on 29/01/2026 on the safety of berberine-containing plant preparations used in food supplements; B. vulgaris root and bark is one of the 13 plant materials it covers, and the draft was released for public consultation in 2026 [60]. The Panel found in vitro evidence of gene mutation and chromosomal damage by berberine, with confirmation in vivo lacking, and no adequate repeated-dose toxicity study of berberine alone. For B. vulgaris it retrieved no eligible genotoxicity study and no eligible mammalian toxicity study. It attributed carcinogenic activity in rodents to goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis) rhizome and root, and idiosyncratic liver injury to greater celandine (Chelidonium majus) herb; neither finding concerns barberry. It also noted transient gastrointestinal effects of berberine supplements and a risk of interactions through CYP3A4. Its overall conclusion was that the available data do not allow a safe intake to be set for any of the preparations assessed [60]. No final opinion had been published when this was checked in October 2026, and the opinion concerns food supplements in the European Union. A web search the same day found no TGA safety alert or advisory on berberine or barberry. AIP comment (Medicine): for barberry the draft records gaps in the data and reports no harm observed with the herb itself. It supports the cautions already given for pregnancy, interacting drugs and high-dose berberine products, and it makes in vivo genotoxicity and repeated-dose studies of a characterised bark extract a research priority. Grade: regulatory review of in vitro, animal and human data; draft.
Referral. Anyone who is pregnant, breastfeeding, caring for a jaundiced newborn, taking ciclosporin or other prescription medicines, or managing diabetes should consult a degree-qualified herbalist with competencies and adequate training in pharmacognosy before using barberry bark. Fainting, palpitations or a racing heart while taking a berberine product, or yellowing of the skin or eyes in a baby, needs urgent medical assessment.

31 more pages follow · 15,424 words, 30 figures, 10 tables
Still to come in this monograph
- 1. Nomenclature
- 2. Definition
- 3. Source and Australian supply
- 4. Macroscopy
- 5. Microscopy
- 6. Chemistry
- 7. Named markers and assay limits
- 8. TLC fingerprint
- 9. HPLC fingerprint
- 10. Identity, purity, adulterants and contaminants
- 11. Traditional use
- 12. Current practice: use, preparations and doses
- 13. Clinical evidence
- 14. Pharmacology
- 16. Discussion
- 17. Conclusions
- 18. Research still needed
- 19. References
- 20. Document control
The rest of this monograph is open to members. One membership covers every members’ feature on the site.
Checking your membership…
Report an error or submit evidence
If something in this monograph is wrong, out of date or missing, tell us and show us the evidence. Every report is logged under the AIP Evidence Charter and assessed on the evidence alone; the outcome is kept on the record, and an upheld report is corrected with a dated notice on this page.
Open the report form
The Institute sets and publishes its own monographs. The catalogue is in Publications.
